189 (3): 601-605. Bibcode:1979MNRAS.189..601U
작성자 정보
- Jennie 작성
- 작성일
본문
Is your smoke detector beeping with a brand new battery? People who smoke often have CO ranges 4 to 15 instances higher than individuals who don't. For subjects who died recently: have you made a reasonable effort to seek out people who might possess pictures of this person and is likely to be keen to release one? People can be blissful to help you at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Editors who falsely declare such objects as their "personal work" can be blocked from modifying.
You can too first use this form to gather the details about your file and then send it to Commons from right here. Such files usually can't be used even underneath the "Honest Use" guidelines, https://www.vapegot.com/the-classic-menthol-ibreathe-20mg-nic-salts except in uncommon circumstances. Wikipedia loves free information. I made this myself, https://www.vapingquick.com/prebuild-coil-fused-clapton-0.45ω-by-coil-art from scratch, https://www.vapegot.com/voopoo-drag-x-plus-kit with out copying or https://www.vapegot.com/raspberry-rhubarb-by-jinx-e-liquid-100ml-shortfill incorporating anybody else's artistic work, and I'm willing to launch it beneath a free license. That is an old photograph, https://www.camedu.org/ or a photographic reproduction of an old painting, drawing, www.joaskin.co.kr and so forth.
I can present enough information about its author and provenance to prove that it is previous sufficient for its copyright to have expired. This is a copyrighted artwork or photograph, and the picture itself is the subject of debate in the article. Example - article okay. Please examine whether it is okay now. I can show that it is legally okay for anybody to make use of, in Wikipedia and elsewhere, for any objective.
Please indicate right here if you have previously revealed this item elsewhere, e.g. on your own website, https://www.vapegot.com/cherry-soda-soda-king-100ml-shortfill-0mg-70vg30pg your Flickr or Facebook account, and so forth., offering a link. Research from 2016 reveals a detailed link between chronic bronchitis and energetic smoking. Cite and provide a hyperlink to the relevant law if possible. If it is in the public area, you should be capable of point to an precise legislation that makes it so. I can display that this work is legally in the general public Domain, i.e.
no one owns any copyrights on it. Public Domain means that no one owns any copyrights on this work. Please describe who owns this work and how you bought it from them. I found this file somewhere, but I don't actually know who made it or who owns it. If you cannot point to such a law but merely found this image someplace, https://www.vapegot.com/sour-melon-surge-beyond-100ml-shortfill-by-ivg then please do not upload it. This isn't for images you merely found somewhere on the net. P.1: Four travelers from Brazil, who were examined throughout routine screening outdoors Tokyo, Japan, had been discovered to be contaminated with the variant P.
You can too first use this form to gather the details about your file and then send it to Commons from right here. Such files usually can't be used even underneath the "Honest Use" guidelines, https://www.vapegot.com/the-classic-menthol-ibreathe-20mg-nic-salts except in uncommon circumstances. Wikipedia loves free information. I made this myself, https://www.vapingquick.com/prebuild-coil-fused-clapton-0.45ω-by-coil-art from scratch, https://www.vapegot.com/voopoo-drag-x-plus-kit with out copying or https://www.vapegot.com/raspberry-rhubarb-by-jinx-e-liquid-100ml-shortfill incorporating anybody else's artistic work, and I'm willing to launch it beneath a free license. That is an old photograph, https://www.camedu.org/ or a photographic reproduction of an old painting, drawing, www.joaskin.co.kr and so forth.
I can present enough information about its author and provenance to prove that it is previous sufficient for its copyright to have expired. This is a copyrighted artwork or photograph, and the picture itself is the subject of debate in the article. Example - article okay. Please examine whether it is okay now. I can show that it is legally okay for anybody to make use of, in Wikipedia and elsewhere, for any objective.
Please indicate right here if you have previously revealed this item elsewhere, e.g. on your own website, https://www.vapegot.com/cherry-soda-soda-king-100ml-shortfill-0mg-70vg30pg your Flickr or Facebook account, and so forth., offering a link. Research from 2016 reveals a detailed link between chronic bronchitis and energetic smoking. Cite and provide a hyperlink to the relevant law if possible. If it is in the public area, you should be capable of point to an precise legislation that makes it so. I can display that this work is legally in the general public Domain, i.e.
no one owns any copyrights on it. Public Domain means that no one owns any copyrights on this work. Please describe who owns this work and how you bought it from them. I found this file somewhere, but I don't actually know who made it or who owns it. If you cannot point to such a law but merely found this image someplace, https://www.vapegot.com/sour-melon-surge-beyond-100ml-shortfill-by-ivg then please do not upload it. This isn't for images you merely found somewhere on the net. P.1: Four travelers from Brazil, who were examined throughout routine screening outdoors Tokyo, Japan, had been discovered to be contaminated with the variant P.
관련자료
-
이전
-
다음
댓글 0개
등록된 댓글이 없습니다.